Ruger Redhawk
Page 1 of 1
Ruger Redhawk
Picked up one of the Umarex Ruger Redhawk revolvers used recently:
Gotta say, I'm a little disappointed in a couple things. One biggie is that the accessory rail isn't standard size. The grooves are spaced right, but it's half again as narrow as a standard weaver rail. Makes sense, since it's the width of the revolver barrel, but I hadn't really thought about it before, and you can't tell from the profile pictures.
Logos are there, but small and hard to see. With the main things (for me) that set this apart from something like the Ekols Vipers being the rail and the trademarks, this just doesn't seem like it warrants the price (the Rugers retail for about three times what I paid for my Vipers).
Haven't gotten to test fire it yet, although mechanically it seems just fine.
Gotta say, I'm a little disappointed in a couple things. One biggie is that the accessory rail isn't standard size. The grooves are spaced right, but it's half again as narrow as a standard weaver rail. Makes sense, since it's the width of the revolver barrel, but I hadn't really thought about it before, and you can't tell from the profile pictures.
Logos are there, but small and hard to see. With the main things (for me) that set this apart from something like the Ekols Vipers being the rail and the trademarks, this just doesn't seem like it warrants the price (the Rugers retail for about three times what I paid for my Vipers).
Haven't gotten to test fire it yet, although mechanically it seems just fine.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|